FINA | mesto      | točke | ime | disc. | čas |
1.      | 0759 |     50PM |
    0:28,44 | |
2.      | 0745 |     50PM |
    0:28,62 | |
3.      | 0730 |     50PM |
    0:28,82 | |
4.      | 0719 |     50PZ |
    0:32,70 | |
5.      | 0714 |     50KZ |
    0:26,48 | |
6.      | 0710 |     50PZ |
    0:32,84 | |
7.      | 0705 |     100KZ |
    0:58,08 | |
8.      | 0691 |     50PM |
    0:29,35 | |
9.      | 0687 |     50KM |
    0:23,69 | |
10.      | 0681 |     50HZ |
    0:30,66 |
50m prosto moški 100m prosto moški 50m prsno moški 100m prsno moški 50m delfin moški 100m delfin moški 50m hrbtno moški 100m hrbtno moški |
        50m prosto ženske         100m prosto ženske         50m prsno ženske         100m prsno ženske         50m delfin ženske         100m delfin ženske         50m hrbtno ženske         100m hrbtno ženske |
mesto |
ime |
letnik |
klub |
čas |
točke |
1.      | 1992 | VV | 0:58,08 | 705 |               (0:56,76; -2.27%) | 2.      | 1994 | TK | 0:59,25 | 664 |               (0:57,15; -3.54%) | 3.      | 1996 | VV | 0:59,89 | 643 |    os.rek. (1:00,23; 0.56%) | 4.      | 1999 | OL | 1:00,35 | 629 |               (0:58,85; -2.48%) | 5.      | 1996 | LL | 1:01,58 | 592 |               (0:58,73; -4.62%) | 6.      | 1999 | BM | 1:02,72 | 560 |    os.rek. (1:02,92; 0.31%) | 7.      | 1997 | TK | 1:03,01 | 552 |               (1:02,94; -0.11%) | 8.      | 1999 | LL | 1:03,13 | 549 |               (1:02,34; -1.25%) | 1.      | 2002 | FR | 1:03,45 | 541 |    os.rek. (1:03,66; 0.33%) | 9.      | 1998 | BM | 1:03,58 | 537 |               (1:02,81; -1.21%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 10.      | 1998 | NC | 1:04,04 | 526 |               (1:02,64; -2.18%) | 11.      | 2000 | TK | 1:04,34 | 519 |    os.rek. (1:05,24; 1.39%) | 12.      | 1998 | TK | 1:05,13 | 500 |               (1:04,85; -0.42%) | 13.      | 1999 | NC | 1:05,22 | 498 |               (1:04,06; -1.77%) | 14.      | 2000 | KK | 1:05,28 | 497 |               (1:05,13; -0.22%) | 15.      | 1999 | TK | 1:05,34 | 495 |               (1:04,74; -0.91%) | 15.      | 1998 | TK | 1:05,34 | 495 |               (1:05,21; -0.19%) | 17.      | 1995 | NC | 1:06,07 | 479 |               (1:04,22; -2.8%) | 18.      | 1996 | NC | 1:06,27 | 475 |               (1:04,86; -2.12%) | 19.      | 1998 | VV | 1:06,45 | 471 |               (1:06,09; -0.54%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 20.      | 2001 | BM | 1:06,59 | 468 |    os.rek. (1:10,29; 5.55%) | 21.      | 2000 | NC | 1:06,74 | 465 |    os.rek. (1:07,35; 0.91%) | 2.      | 2002 | FR | 1:06,93 | 461 |               (1:06,72; -0.31%) | 22.      | 2000 | TK | 1:07,78 | 444 |               (1:07,51; -0.39%) | 23.      | 2001 | RL | 1:08,36 | 432 |    os.rek. (1:09,18; 1.19%) | 3.      | 2002 | KKR | 1:08,60 | 428 |    os.rek. (1:10,44; 2.68%) | 4.      | 2003 | LL | 1:08,64 | 427 |    os.rek. (1:09,98; 1.95%) | 24.      | 1999 | RA | 1:08,88 | 423 |    os.rek. (1:09,32; 0.63%) | 25.      | 2001 | OL | 1:08,89 | 422 |               (1:08,33; -0.81%) | 26.      | 2001 | KKR | 1:09,31 | 415 |    os.rek. (1:09,71; 0.57%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 5.      | 2002 | KK | 1:09,81 | 406 |               (1:08,10; -2.44%) | 6.      | 2002 | RL | 1:09,84 | 405 |    os.rek. (1:09,88; 0.05%) | 7.      | 2002 | FR | 1:09,88 | 405 |               (1:07,19; -3.84%) | 27.      | 2001 | LL | 1:09,95 | 403 |               (1:09,09; -1.22%) | 28.      | 2001 | TK | 1:10,28 | 398 |    os.rek. (1:10,69; 0.58%) | 29.      | 1997 | SDD | 1:10,29 | 398 |               (1:09,78; -0.72%) | 8.      | 2002 | RL | 1:10,31 | 397 |               (1:09,46; -1.2%) | 30.      | 2000 | LL | 1:10,39 | 396 |               (1:08,77; -2.3%) | 30.      | 2001 | LL | 1:10,39 | 396 |               (1:09,81; -0.82%) | 9.      | 2002 | SDD | 1:10,53 | 394 |    os.rek. (1:10,66; 0.18%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 10.      | 2002 | OL | 1:10,89 | 388 |    os.rek. (1:11,80; 1.28%) | 32.      | 1998 | SDD | 1:10,94 | 387 |    os.rek. (1:12,13; 1.67%) | 11.      | 2002 | VV | 1:11,12 | 384 |               (1:09,84; -1.79%) | 12.      | 2002 | RAD | 1:11,34 | 380 |    os.rek. (1:12,85; 2.11%) | 33.      | 1999 | KA | 1:11,65 | 375 |               (1:10,26; -1.93%) | 34.      | 2000 | TK | 1:11,74 | 374 |               (1:11,28; -0.64%) | 35.      | 2001 | BM | 1:11,90 | 371 |               (1:10,72; -1.64%) | 13.      | 2003 | RL | 1:11,91 | 371 |    os.rek. (1:12,13; 0.3%) | 14.      | 2003 | RR | 1:11,95 | 371 |               (1:11,81; -0.19%) | 15.      | 2002 | OL | 1:12,00 | 370 |    os.rek. (1:13,92; 2.66%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 36.      | 2001 | TK | 1:12,33 | 365 |               (1:11,99; -0.47%) | 16.      | 2002 | RL | 1:12,46 | 363 |    os.rek. (1:14,02; 2.15%) | 37.      | 2000 | IL | 1:12,61 | 361 |               (1:11,89; -0.99%) | 38.      | 2001 | NC | 1:12,79 | 358 |               (1:12,18; -0.83%) | 17.      | 2003 | RR | 1:13,03 | 354 |    os.rek. (1:21,59; 11.72%) | 39.      | 1999 | RL | 1:13,09 | 354 |               (1:12,77; -0.43%) | 40.      | 2001 | LL | 1:13,58 | 347 |               (1:11,82; -2.39%) | 41.      | 2001 | LL | 1:13,61 | 346 |               (1:12,86; -1.01%) | 42.      | 2000 | BM | 1:13,69 | 345 |               (1:12,94; -1.01%) | 43.      | 2000 | TK | 1:14,01 | 341 |               (1:12,00; -2.71%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 1.      | 2004 | LL | 1:14,25 | 337 |    os.rek. (1:15,55; 1.75%) | 44.      | 2001 | RAD | 1:14,39 | 335 |    os.rek. (1:15,16; 1.03%) | 18.      | 2002 | OL | 1:14,81 | 330 |    os.rek. (1:16,97; 2.88%) | 45.      | 2001 | TK | 1:15,50 | 321 |               (1:12,57; -3.88%) | 19.      | 2003 | RA | 1:15,57 | 320 |    os.rek. (1:16,79; 1.61%) | 20.      | 2003 | KA | 1:15,63 | 319 |               (1:15,62; -0.01%) | 46.      | 1996 | RL | 1:15,97 | 315 |    os.rek. (1:17,98; 2.64%) | 21.      | 2003 | LL | 1:16,09 | 313 |    os.rek. (1:17,72; 2.14%) | 47.      | 2000 | PKR | 1:16,18 | 312 |               (1:14,36; -2.38%) | 22.      | 2003 | NC | 1:16,56 | 308 |               (1:15,11; -1.89%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 48.      | 1998 | ZVK | 1:16,60 | 307 |               (1:15,27; -1.73%) | 23.      | 2002 | IL | 1:17,18 | 300 |    os.rek. (1:19,93; 3.56%) | 24.      | 2003 | LL | 1:17,35 | 298 |    os.rek. (1:17,53; 0.23%) | 25.      | 2003 | OL | 1:18,17 | 289 |               (1:17,01; -1.48%) | 26.      | 2002 | BM | 1:18,23 | 288 |               (1:17,13; -1.4%) | 49.      | 2001 | RR | 1:18,59 | 284 |    os.rek. (1:20,68; 2.65%) | 27.      | 2003 | TK | 1:18,75 | 283 |               (1:16,98; -2.24%) | 28.      | 2003 | TK | 1:19,97 | 270 |               (1:18,77; -1.5%) | 2.      | 2004 | BM | 1:20,21 | 267 |    os.rek. (1:22,32; 2.63%) | 3.      | 2004 | ZR | 1:20,38 | 266 |    os.rek. (1:22,23; 2.3%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 29.      | 2003 | TK | 1:20,63 | 263 |               (1:16,87; -4.66%) | 30.      | 2003 | FR | 1:20,95 | 260 |    os.rek. (1:27,85; 8.52%) | 31.      | 2002 | RL | 1:21,49 | 255 |    os.rek. (1:23,18; 2.07%) | 32.      | 2002 | TK | 1:21,81 | 252 |    os.rek. (1:25,50; 4.51%) | 33.      | 2003 | FR | 1:22,06 | 250 |    os.rek. (1:22,79; 0.88%) | 34.      | 2002 | TK | 1:22,22 | 248 |               (1:21,52; -0.85%) | 35.      | 2002 | RL | 1:22,85 | 243 |               (1:20,14; -3.27%) | 4.      | 2004 | RA | 1:22,99 | 241 |    os.rek. (1:23,61; 0.74%) | 36.      | 2003 | KKR | 1:24,87 | 226 |               (1:24,53; -0.4%) | 5.      | 2004 | IL | 1:24,96 | 225 |    os.rek. (1:25,22; 0.3%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 50.      | 2000 | TK | 1:26,51 | 213 |               (1:22,70; -4.4%) | 6.      | 2004 | FR | 1:26,71 | 212 |    os.rek. (1:31,27; 5.25%) | 37.      | 2003 | IL | 1:27,71 | 204 |    os.rek. (1:28,47; 0.86%) | 7.      | 2004 | RR | 1:27,73 | 204 |               (1:27,48; -0.28%) | 8.      | 2004 | LL | 1:27,74 | 204 |    os.rek. (1:45,91; 20.7%) | 51.      | 2001 | TK | 1:27,74 | 204 |               (1:26,51; -1.4%) | 1.      | 2006 | TK | 1:28,26 | 201 |    os.rek. (1:31,05; 3.16%) | 9.      | 2004 | LL | 1:28,59 | 198 |    os.rek. (1:30,40; 2.04%) | 10.      | 2005 | KK | 1:29,67 | 191 |               (1:23,36; -7.03%) | 38.      | 2003 | KA | 1:29,73 | 191 |    os.rek. (1:30,94; 1.34%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 11.      | 2004 | NG | 1:30,68 | 185 |    os.rek. (1:44,78; 15.54%) | 12.      | 2004 | LL | 1:32,16 | 176 |    os.rek. (1:45,72; 14.71%) | 39.      | 2003 | RL | 1:32,78 | 173 |    os.rek. (1:37,67; 5.27%) | 40.      | 2002 | KA | 1:32,91 | 172 |    os.rek. (1:35,51; 2.79%) | 41.      | 2002 | KA | 1:33,86 | 167 |               (1:30,09; -4.01%) | 42.      | 2003 | IL | 1:33,89 | 167 |               (1:31,58; -2.46%) | 43.      | 2003 | IL | 1:34,64 | 163 |    os.rek. (brez rezultata) | 13.      | 2004 | KKR | 1:36,01 | 156 |    os.rek. (1:37,29; 1.33%) | 14.      | 2004 | KA | 1:36,82 | 152 |    os.rek. (1:41,92; 5.26%) | 15.      | 2004 | OL | 1:37,59 | 148 |    os.rek. (1:37,75; 0.16%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 16.      | 2005 | TK | 1:37,68 | 148 |    os.rek. (1:45,90; 8.41%) | 17.      | 2004 | KA | 1:38,07 | 146 |    os.rek. (brez rezultata) | 2.      | 2006 | RAD | 1:38,27 | 145 |    os.rek. (1:41,31; 3.09%) | 44.      | 2003 | PKA | 1:38,51 | 144 |    os.rek. (1:40,79; 2.31%) | 18.      | 2005 | KA | 1:42,07 | 130 |    os.rek. (1:44,18; 2.06%) | 19.      | 2004 | KA | 1:42,49 | 128 |               (1:40,11; -2.32%) | 20.      | 2004 | OL | 1:42,60 | 128 |    os.rek. (brez rezultata) | 52.      | 2001 | ZVK | 1:43,15 | 125 |               (1:33,00; -9.84%) | 21.      | 2005 | TK | 1:43,18 | 125 |    os.rek. (1:45,72; 2.46%) | 3.      | 2006 | SDD | 1:49,13 | 106 |               (1:42,74; -5.85%) |
  |   |   |   |   | 22.      | 2005 | RR | 1:50,06 | 103 |               (1:44,09; -5.42%) |